Wallsten 5 not a technically challenging principle of psychological egoism. Extending introspection to a universal level is necessary if we are to ever begin to understand human beings at any substantial level. Wallsten 4 probably be indispensable when it comes to moral education. Once she is no longer playing to win, she relaxes and thus wins. If a person asserts or believes a general statement in such a way that he cannot conceive of any possible experience which he would count as evidence against it, then he cannot be said to be asserting or believing an empirical hypothesis. If one unpacks the notion of happiness to include getting satisfaction from relationships with others, getting a sense of self-worth from achievements at work,getting a feeling of support and belonging by having close relationships with family members, feeling pride from having and being a good friend, etc. Wallsten 6 Moving to the second principle of psychological egoism, Feinberg again begins by attacking the apparent logical fallacy employed, but then moves on to a more substantial attack on the underlying context of the claim being made.

Then when that desire was satisfied, Lincoln of course derived pleasure. It’s hard to follow these arguments. In no way do my actions indicate I had any motives in mind other than my own pleasure. It is merely stating that if the logic is unsound at this point, given our own intuitions and knowledge of ourselves and given we are absolutely truthful with ourselves, no matter how embarrassing or disillusioning such revelations may be , it is only so because a good logical procedure for extrapolating from individuals to general populations has not been defined. He is concerned with the apparent non-sequitur found when we try to extrapolate from the individual level to the level of the group as a whole.

By Hans Bernhard Schmid.

Can you help me clarify? The former is mostly justified on the latter. Nonetheless, they might contend that our other ultimate motives self-fulfillment, power, etc.

Supplement on Feinberg’s “Psychological Egoism”

Only by letting go of the desire to enjoy winning a game is she able to enjoy the pleasure of winning a game It may be true that happiness is all that is valuable in many of these cases, but this does not entail that the ends of our desires is always happiness, though it may often be a by-product.


Demonstrated in Geometrical Psuchological.

joel feinberg psychological egoism essay

On that psychologkcal, I support psychological egoism and all of its conclusions. It is a fine line to tread, but one I hope to tackle a bit later in this paper.

I would counter that the argument is no different here between the nature of human motives and the nature of consciousness.

He is concerned with the apparent non-sequitur found when we try to extrapolate from the individual level to the level of the group as a whole.

When one into one equals oneness.

Supplement on Feinberg’s “Psychological Egoism”

But, he cites a general example of where he sees a logical contradiction, namely in the case of instant gratification. By Hans Bernhard Schmid. It is not really an attack on the theory itself, but rather on the implications of the theory.

I apologize, I was a little tired when I wrote up the post. If so, it’s an interesting argument, but I feel that I can still intuitively make sense of the notion of desiring happiness alone. Psychological Egoism is the position that the ultimate motive of all actions is selfish. I conclude that the proper response to a terse objection like “What about suicide bombers?

How would the truth of such a contention be established? Analytic statements —true by definition here empirical information is irrelevant and superfluous.

Given more time, we might come to learn far more about the nature of human actions with this principle in mind. Though the theory claims we are all selfish, this must be taken to mean self-interested, and therefore looking to promote our own happiness, though not necessarily at the expense of others as Feinberg might have you believe. Joel Feinberg presents a multitude of arguments against psychological egoistic hedonism.

Psychological Egoism

It is true that there is very little science supporting psychological egoism, yet this is not so much a product of falsifiable or outright wrong ideas, but a description of the difficulty of measuring empirically what it means to be human and to seek out our own ways. Feinberg has no serious jeol to criticize the third principle of essaj egoism given that no logical mistakes were made. After all, if I am hungry, my choice of food does not really impede my ability to choose in such a way that pleases me.


joel feinberg psychological egoism essay

Is Management Theory Too ” Self-ish “. It is his claim that it is not true that psycholoical objective of every action is to get pleasure, but more importantly it is not guaranteed that fulfillment of desire brings about satisfaction.

;sychological Center Find new research papers in: It is a sad fact that psychological egoism allows for morally detestable outcomes, but this is not to be unexpected; the theory does not attempt to say how we ought psychologjcal be, but how we are. Wallsten 9 morally appropriate way and punishing them when they have not, could lead to situations wherein if the probability were negligible or very remote that one might be caught one might be tempted to commit psycholoogical that are objectively, morally detestable.

This would require knowing all possible actions and all possible outcomes in order to guarantee rational decision-making. It should be noted that this theory is not concerned with the well-being, or pleasure generation, of groups of individuals, and is therefore only roughly similar to utilitarianism, if at all.

joel feinberg psychological egoism essay

Sorry, if you mean that it’s hard to follow my arguments. Wallsten 5 not a technically challenging principle of psychological egoism.